Monday, October 21, 2019

Jehoash Inscription Tablet is it authentic or is it fake?





 
Jehoash tablet

 
 
 
 
“However, when the tablet was illuminated with ultraviolet light, there was no characteristic fluorescence indicative of fresh engraving scars. In addition,
the biogenic black to reddish patina is covering and firmly attached to the letters
with morphological continuity to the tablet surface …”.
 
 A. Rosenfeld et al.
 
 
  
 
The tablet is authentic according to the following expert view:
 
Archaeometric evidence for the authenticity of the Jehoash Inscription Tablet
 
A gray, fine-grained arkosic sandstone tablet bearing an inscription in ancient Hebrew from the First Temple Period contains a rich assemblage of particles accumulated in the covering patina. Two types of patina cover the tablet: a thin layer of black to orange iron-oxide-rich layer, a product of micro-biogenic processes, and a light beige patina that contains feldspars, carbonate, iron oxide, subangular quartz grains, carbon ash particles and gold globules (1 to 4 micrometers [1 micrometer = 0.001 millimeter] in diameter). The patina covers the rock surface as well as the engraved lettering grooves and blankets and thus post-dates the incised inscription as well as a crack that runs across the stone and several of the engraved letters. Radiocarbon analyses of the carbon particles in the patina yield a calibrated radiocarbon age of 2340 to 2150 Cal BP. The presence of microcolonial fungi and associated pitting in the patina indicates slow growth over many years. The occurrence of pure gold globules is evidence of a thermal event in close proximity to the tablet (above 1000 degrees Celsius). This study supports the antiquity of the patina, which in turn, strengthens the contention that the inscription is authentic.
 
By A. Rosenfeld
Geological Survey of Israel

S. Ilani
Geological Survey of Israel

H. R. Feldman
The Anna Ruth and Mark Hasten School, A Division of Touro College
Division of Paleontology (Invertebrates), American Museum of Natural History

W. E. Krumbein
Department of Geomicrobiology, ICBM, Carl von Ossietzky Universitaet, Oldenburg, Germany

J. Kronfeld
Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Tel-Aviv University
November 2008
 
INTRODUCTION
 
Our team of scientists spent some time examining the Jehoash Inscription tablet (JI) from the point of view of hard science (Ilani et al., 2002; 2008). Our goal was to determine, based solely on scientific evidence, whether the tablet is a forgery or genuine. Since this tablet represents the only Judahite royal inscription found to date, it is of critical importance to history and Biblical Archaeology. The tablet is engraved with an inscription in ancient Hebrew that commemorates the renovation of the First Temple carried out by King Jehoash (9th century B.C.E. = 2800 years BP).
A similar account of the Temple repairs is also found in Kings II: 12. According to Cohen (2007; 2008), the translation of the 16 lines of the ancient Hebrew is as follows:
 
I. Prologue (lines 1-4)
[I am Yeho'ash, son of
A]hazyahu, k[ing over Ju]dah,
and I executed the re[pai]rs.
II. Body of the inscription (lines 4-14)
When men's hearts became
replete with generosity in
the (densely populated) land and in the (sparsely
populated) steppe, and in all the cities of Judah, to
donate money for the sacred
contributions abundantly,
in order to purchase quarry
stone and juniper wood and
Edomite copper / copper from (the city of) ‘Adam,
(and) in order to perform
the work faithfully (=without corruption),—
(Then) I renovated the
breach(es) of the Temple
and of the surrounding
walls, and the storied structure,
and the meshwork, and the winding stairs,
and the recesses, and the doors.
III. Epilogue (lines 14-16)
May (this inscribed stone) become this day
a witness that the work has succeeded,
(and) may God (thus) ordain His people with a blessing.
 
Analyses of the tablet's epigraphy and philology to date have proven to be inconclusive as to its authenticity (Ilani et al., 2002; 2008). Chemical, geologic and petrographic analyses support the antiquity of the patina, which in turn, strengthens the contention that the inscription is authentic.
 
THE TABLET
 
The general color of the fine-grained JI tablet is gray to black (Ilani et al., 2002; 2008). A fissure, less than 0.5 millimeters (mm) in width, runs across the central part of the tablet parallel to the broken upper edge, crossing ten letters in four lines (Fig. 1). The crack fades inward toward the center of the tablet and is almost invisible on its back. The presence of the crack favors the authenticity of the inscription since a modern engraver would have known that incising across this line of weakness would have jeopardized the structural integrity of the tablet. The tablet broke into two separate pieces along this fissure after being taken into custodial care by the Israel Antiquity Authority (IAA).
The sudden breakage of the tablet revealed that the top half of the fissure exhibits some natural bleaching and incipient patina formation due to weathering whereas the lower part of the tablet exhibits a clearly fresh line of breakage (Figs. 2 and 3).
Analysis shows that the rock tablet is composed mainly of very small unsorted subangular quartz grains and angular to subrounded, unsorted feldspar grains. When we studied the rock in thin section (slices about 0.03mm in thickness) we found that it is composed of the following minerals: quartz (35%), feldspars (55%), epidote (3%), chlorite (1%), rutile and sphene (<1 1968="" 1987="" 2002="" a="" al.="" also="" amudei="" analysis="" ancient="" and="" are="" area="" arieh="" arkosic="" artifact.="" as="" aspersion="" authenticity="" available="" basin="" by="" cambrian="" carved="" cast="" classify="" confirmed="" dead="" definition="" deposition="" dr.="" eissbrod="" el-khadem="" ender="" erroneous.="" et="" examined="" formation="" formations="" formed.="" found="" from="" geological="" geology="" goren="" graywacke.="" has="" hieroglyphic="" however="" hundreds="" identification="" implications="" in="" inscriptions="" iron="" is="" israel="" ji="" jordan="" judea.="" kingdoms="" lani="" led="" levant.="" local="" made="" mainly="" metamorphic="" middle="" new="" not="" note="" occurs="" of.="" of="" often="" on="" opaques="" original="" our="" outcrops="" oxides="" part="" petrographer="" provenance="" reported="" rock="" rocks="" same="" sandstone.="" sandstone="" sea="" section="" serabit="" shechoret="" shelomo="" shimron="" sinai="" south="" southern="" southwest="" span="" stelae="" stone="" such="" survey="" tablet="" temple="" that="" the="" their="" them="" therefore="" these="" thin="" this="" thus="" timna="" to="" type="" upper="" was="" which="" with="" workers="" yehoash="">
Many of the incised letters exhibit defects in shape at their edges. These defects are due to the detachment of quartz and feldspar grains during the erosion and weathering of the sandstone.
 
THE PATINA
 
The patina is the outer crust that was formed due to chemical and biological conditions resulting from weathering of the rock and the material interacted and accreted from its burial environment. The patina on the side of the inscription is composed of two layers (Figs. 4 and 5). The first thin layer, up to 1 mm thick, is attached firmly to the rock. This film-like black to reddish-brown iron oxide, covers the surfaces of the tablet and the letters. As the rock tablet contains about 5% iron oxides, we believe that the formation of this film may be related to natural geobiological weathering processes. A second layer, lighter in color, beige to ochre and up to 1 mm thick, is found mostly within the letters but also on the surface that was partly cleaned. This light patina covers also the fractures and the middle crack (Fig. 1; Ilani et al., 2002, Fig.3; Ilani et al., 2008, Fig. 1b). It contains silica, feldspar and carbonate minerals that form a texture of interlocking grains supported by carbonate matrix that contains small carbon ash particles (Ilani et al., 2002, Fig. 5). Some pure gold globules of 1-4 micrometers in diameter were also detected (Ilani et al., 2002, Fig. 6). The patina obviously was formed naturally because the tablet was buried for an extensive period within a tel or soil environment. We can exclude a cave as the site of deposition.
 
The patina on the surface carrying the inscription is composed of elements derived from the tablet itself (e.g., quartz and feldspar grains) as well as from the environment (dolomite, limestone, carbon ash particles, and gold globules). The patina on the back of the tablet has the same composition but with some silica and carbonate in one place (about 2.5 cm in diameter) near the top of the tablet. This siliceous-carbonate material could be an original vein filling within a bedding plane or a joint in the original rock, similar to those found in the clastic rocks exposed in southern Israel and Sinai, and may represent a natural rock fissure along which the rock was detached for further processing as is the case in many quarries. Thus, the remnants of a vein were thought to be the "real" patina by Goren et al., (2004). The fact that it does not appear on the inscription surface was proof that the inscription was forged.
Moreover, Goren et al., (2004) suggest that the patina on the inscribed face of the tablet is too soft to be regarded as genuine. However, we propose that the softness or hardness of the patina cannot be used as an indicator of authenticity, especially as we reported that the light patina had been exposed to cleaning. But the biogenic black-reddish patina with the pitting made by microorganisms is firmly connected to the stone (Figs. 2-3).
The suggestion by Goren et al., (2004, p. 14) that "heated water was used to harden and ensure good adhesion of the patina" seems to us unfounded.
After production and the engraving of the JI inscription, the tablet underwent significant changes by burial processes, especially by cleaning and enhancement after excavation. The surface of the JI, as well as the letters, is covered by continuous black-reddish and beige patina layers (Figs. 4-6). No indications of adhesive materials or other artificial substances that could indicate addition, pasting, or dispersion of artificial patina on the inscribed face of the tablet have been observed.
 
AGE OF THE PATINA
 
Carbon ash particles are trapped within the patina. Samples of the patina were radiocarbon dated at an age of 2340 to 2150 years ago (Ilani et. al., 2008; t\Table 2).
 
GOLD GLOBULES
 
The gold globules that we detected are minute, usually 1 to 2 micrometers in diameter and were found in 4 of the 9 samples taken from the patina (Ilani et al., 2002, Fig. 6). The gold is in the form of individual globules of well sorted size (1-4 micrometers). The distribution of the globules detected by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) is approximately 10 globules per square mm and the total weight of the globules in the patina was calculated to be to less than 0.001 g for the entire tablet.
 
MICROCOLONIAL FUNGI
 
Microcolonial Fungi (MCF) are known to concentrate and deposit manganese and iron and play a key role in the alteration and biological weathering of rocks and minerals. They are microorganisms of high survivability, inhabiting rocks in extreme conditions and are also known to survive in subsurface and subaerial environments.
We found long-living black yeast-like fungi that form pitted embedded circular structures of 20-500 micrometers in size on the patina (inside the letters [Fig. 4] as well Ilani et al., 2008, Figs. 9,10). A Nabbatean flint instrument from Avdat, southern Israel, 2,000 years old, shows an identical MCF black red-brown coloration and pitted circular structures as in the JI tablet. These fungal colonies (identified as Coniosporium sp. and related species) grow very slowly over dozens to hundreds of years.
 
DISCUSSION
 
We found a rich assemblage of different particles within the patina of the JI tablet that contains feldspars, carbonate, iron oxide, subangular quartz grains, carbon ash particles and gold globules (1 to 4 micrometers in diameter). Goren et al., (2004) claimed that gold globules were incorporated into the patina by a forger. Gold powder comprised of globules 1-2 micrometers in diameter does not exist in the modern gold market as suggested by them. Gold globules in today's market are of a wide range and mix of sizes, the smallest diameter being 500 micrometers. However, gold powder or dust, with an average size between 70 to 80 micrometers, has an angular shape. Native gold dust from Sardis, Turkey contains irregular flattened flakes with rounded edges, 100-500 micrometers in size, but not globules. According to Meeks (2000), pure gold globules of 3-300 micrometers in diameter were found in the production and refining site of Sardis resulting from melting processes. One would expect many gold globules of various sizes to occur in clustered aggregates in the patina if it were of recent origin, but this is clearly not the case. The small amounts detected and its distribution would be difficult to produce within any artificial patina. The occurrence of pure gold globules (1-2 micrometers) is evidence of the melting of gold artifacts or gold-gilded items (above 1000 degrees Celsius).
Exposures of Cretaceous marine carbonate rocks are abundant in Jerusalem and provide a majority of its building stone. Indeed, well preserved marine carbonate microfossils that were found within the patina were derived from the weathering of these exposed rocks as well as by wind transport. These minute fossils occur in abundance in everyday dust in Jerusalem (Ehrenberg, 1860; Ganor, 1975) as well as in the local soils. But, Goren et al., (2004) claimed that their finding of foraminifera (microfossils) within the patina of the engraved surface of the JI tablet is a proof of a fake patina. We maintain that these microfossils within the patina can be easily explained as a component of a genuine patina derived from the surrounding Cretaceous marine carbonate rocks that are ubiquitous in the Judean Mountains. Indeed, their absence within a patina purportedly coming from the Jerusalem area would be suspicious since the entire city is situated upon these marine rock exposures. These microfossils should be as plentiful in the historical past as they are today. We therefore strongly disagree that these microfossils are an indication of forgery.
Goren et al, (2004) claimed that the engraved marks of the letters are fresh. They said that signs of fresh cuttings and polishing are exposed within the letters. Fresh engraving can be easily revealed by illuminating the tablet with ultraviolet light (Newman, 1990). However, when the tablet was illuminated with ultraviolet light, there was no characteristic fluorescence indicative of fresh engraving scars. In addition, the biogenic black to reddish patina is covering and firmly attached to the letters with morphological continuity to the tablet surface (Figs. 2, 3 and 6).
Based upon the results of four oxygen isotopic analyses of the carbonate patina, Goren et al., (2004) concluded that the tablet must be a fake. Yet, of the four samples only two can be related to carbonate precipitation from fresh water. The two enriched ("heavy") delta O18 (capital O is the chemistry symbol of oxygen; delta O18 is the measured ratio of the O18/O16 isotopes of the oxygen) values (-1.7 per thousand and –0.9 per thousand PDB) of the patina carbonate presented by Goren et al. (2004) can be attributed to the predominance of a marine carbonate component (upon which Jerusalem sits and its building stone is made). The conclusion that the patina must be a fake is thus drawn upon the basis of the only two depleted delta O18 patina analyses which they compared to the delta O18 values preserved in dated stalagmite caves in the Jerusalem area (Goren et al., 2004, p. 7 and Fig. 9). They concluded that the delta O18 values of the carbonate patina are too depleted to have been derived from natural meteoric water of the region and therefore claimed evidence of fraud. However, there are ways that isotopically depleted carbonate can be generated and incorporated into a genuine patina. One example  is a thermal event. It has recently been brought to our attention that an isotopic study of white crusts that cover limestones that had been burned during the destruction of the Second Temple at 70 C.E. show depleted delta O18 PDB values (-10.7 per thousand -13.4 per thousand) (Dr. A. Shimron, personal communication, 2004). Therefore such isotopic depleted carbonate values are found in the Jerusalem area. ….
 
 
 

Thursday, October 17, 2019

So-called “Minoans” were the Philistines



Philistines Flee

by
 
Damien F. Mackey
 
 
  
 
 
Those whom Sir Arthur Evans fancifully named ‘the Minoans’,
based on the popular legend of King Minos, son of Zeus,
are biblically and historically attested as the Philistines.  
 
 
 
 
Gavin Menzies has followed Arthur Evans in labelling as “Minoans” the great sea-faring and trading nation that is the very focal point of his fascinating book, The Lost Empire of Atlantis: History's Greatest Mystery Revealed (HarperCollins, 2011). Though the ex-submariner, Menzies, can sometimes ‘go a bit overboard’ - or, should I say, he can become a bit ‘airborne’ (and don’t we all?) - he is often highly informative and is always eminently readable.
According to the brief summary of the book that we find at Menzies’ own site: http://www.gavinmenzies.net/lost-empire-atlantis/the-book/
 
 
... the Minoans. It’s long been known that this extraordinary civilisation, with its great palaces and sea ports based in Crete and nearby Thera (now called Santorini), had a level of sophistication that belied its place in the Bronze Age world but never before has the extent of its reach been uncovered.
 
Through painstaking research, including recent DNA evidence, Menzies has pieced together an incredible picture of a cultured people who traded with India and Mesopotamia, Africa and Western Europe, including Britain and Ireland, and even sailed to North America.
 
Menzies reveals that copper found at Minoan sites can only have come from Lake Superior, and that it was copper, combined with tin from Cornwall and elsewhere, to make bronze, that gave the Minoans their wealth. He uses knowledge gleaned as a naval captain to explore ancient shipbuilding and navigation techniques and explain how the Minoans were able to travel so far. He looks at why the Minoan empire, which was 1500 years ahead of China and Greece in terms of science, architecture, art and language, disappeared so abruptly and what led to her destruction. ...
 
[End of quote]
 
The Philistines
 
Thanks to Dr. Donovan Courville (The Exodus Problem and its Ramifications, Loma Linda CA, 1971), we can trace the Philistines - through their distinctive pottery - all the way back to Neolithic Knossos (Crete). And this, despite J. C. Greenfield’s assertion: “There is no evidence for a Philistine occupation of Crete, nor do the facts about the Philistines, known from archaeological and literary sources, betray any relationship between them and Crete” (IDB, 1962, vol. 1, p. 534). The distinctive type of pottery that Courville has identified as belonging to the biblical Philistines is well described in this quote that he has taken from Kathleen Kenyon:
 
The pottery does in fact provide very useful evidence about culture. The first interesting point is the wealth of a particular class of painted pottery …. The decoration is bichrome, nearly always red and black, and the most typical vessels have a combination of metopes enclosing a bird or a fish with geometric decoration such as a “Union Jack” pattern or a Catherine wheel. At Megiddo the first bichrome pottery is attributed to Stratum X, but all the published material comes from tombs intrusive into this level. It is in fact characteristic of Stratum IX. Similar pottery is found in great profusion in southern Palestine … Very similar vessels are also found on the east coast of Cyprus and on the coastal Syrian sites as far north as Ras Shamra. [Emphasis Courville’s]
 
By contrast, the pottery of the ‘Sea Peoples’ - a maritime confederation confusingly identified sometimes as the early biblical Philistines, their pottery like, but not identical to the distinctive Philistine pottery as described above - was Aegean (Late Helladic), not Cretan.  
 
The indispensable “Table of Nations” (Genesis 10), informs us that the Philistines were a Hamitic people, descendants of Ham’s “son”, Mizraim (or Egypt) (v. 6).
Genesis 10:13: “Mizraim was the father of the Ludites, Anamites, Lehabites, Naphtuhites, Pathrusites, Kasluhites (from whom the Philistines came) and Caphtorites”.
These earliest Philistines would be represented by the users of this distinctive pottery at Neolithic I level Knossos (Dr. Courville):
 
With the evidences thus far noted before us, we are now in a position to examine the archaeological reports from Crete for evidences of the early occupation of this site by the Caphtorim (who are either identical to the Philistines of later Scripture or are closely related to them culturally). We now have at least an approximate idea of the nature of the culture for which we are looking ….
 
… we can hardly be wrong in recognizing the earliest occupants of Crete as the people who represented the beginnings of the people later known in Scripture as the Philistines, by virtue of the stated origin of the Philistines in Crete. This concept holds regardless of the name that may be applied to this early era by scholars.
The only site at which Cretan archaeology has been examined for its earliest occupants is at the site of the palace at Knossos. At this site deep test pits were dug into the earlier occupation levels. If there is any archaeological evidence available from Crete for its earliest period, it should then be found from the archaeology of these test pits. The pottery found there is described by Dr. Furness, who is cited by Hutchinson.
 
“Dr. Furness divides the early Neolithic I fabrics into (a) coarse unburnished ware and (b) fine burnished ware, only differing from the former in that the pot walls are thinner, the clay better mixed, and the burnish more carefully executed. The surface colour is usually black, but examples also occur of red, buff or yellow, sometimes brilliant red or orange, and sometimes highly variegated sherds”.
 
A relation was observed between the decoration of some of this pottery from early Neolithic I in Crete with that at the site of Alalakh ….
 
Continuing to cite Dr. Furness, Hutchinson commented:
 
Dr. Furness justly observes that “as the pottery of the late Neolithic phases seems to have developed at Knossos without a break, it is to the earliest that one must look for evidence of origin of foreign connections”, and she therefore stresses the importance of a small group with plastic decoration that seems mainly confined to the Early Neolithic I levels, consisting of rows of pellets immediately under the rim (paralleled on burnished pottery of Chalcolithic [predynastic] date from Gullucek in the Alaca [Alalakh] district of Asia Minor). [Emphasis Courville’s]
 
While the Archaeological Ages of early Crete cannot with certainty be correlated with the corresponding eras on the mainland, it would seem that Chalcolithic on the mainland is later than Early Neolithic in Crete; hence any influence of one culture on the other is more probably an influence of early Cretan culture on that of the mainland. This is in agreement with Scripture to the effect that the Philistines migrated from Crete to what is now the mainland at some point prior to the time of Abraham.[[1]]
[End of quotes]
 
Late Chalcolithic, we have already learned, pertains to the era of Abram (Abraham), when the Philistines were apparently in southern Canaan:
 
Better archaeological model for Abraham
 
 
We next find the Philistines in the land of Palestine (the Gaza region) at the time of Joshua. Was there a Philistine migration out of Crete (“Caphtor”) at the time of the Exodus migration out of Egypt? (Amos 9:7): “Did I not bring Israel up from Egypt, the Philistines from Caphtor and the Arameans from Kir?”
Dr. John Bimson becomes interesting at this point, as previously I have written:
 
Here I take up Bimson’s account of this biblical tradition:[2]
 
There is a tradition preserved in Joshua 13:2-3 and Judges 3:3 that the Philistines were established in Canaan by the end of the Conquest, and that the Israelites had been unable to oust them from the coastal plain …. There is also an indication that the main Philistine influx had not occurred very much prior to the Conquest. As we shall see below, the Philistines are the people referred to as “the Caphtorim, who came from Caphtor” in Deuteronomy 2:23 … where it is said that a people called the Avvim originally occupied the region around Gaza, and that the Caphtorim “destroyed them and settled in their stead”. Josh. 13:2-3 mentions Philistines and Avvim together as peoples whom the Israelites had failed to dislodge from southern Canaan. This suggests that the Philistines had not completely replaced the Avvim by the end of Joshua’s life. I would suggest, in fact, that the war referred to in Ex. 13:17, which was apparently taking place in “the land of the Philistines” at the time of the Exodus, was the war of the Avvim against the newly arrived Philistines.
 
As conventionally viewed, the end of MB II C coincides with the expulsion of the Hyksos from Egypt. Bimson however, in his efforts to provide a revised stratigraphy for the revision of history, has synchronised MB II C instead with the start of Hyksos rule. He will argue here in some detail that the building and refortifying of cities at this time was the work of the Avvim against the invading Philistines, with some of the new settlements, however, likely having been built by the Philistines themselves.
 
[End of quote]
 
I have further written on Dr. Bimson’s laudable effort to bring some archaeological sanity to this era:
 
Bimson has grappled with trying to distinguish between what might have been archaeological evidence for the Philistines and evidence for the Hyksos, though in actual fact it may be fruitless to try to discern a clear distinction in this case. Thus he writes:[3] 
 
Finds at Tell el-Ajjul, in the Philistine plain, about 5 miles SW of Gaza, present a particularly interesting situation. As I have shown elsewhere, the “Palace I” city (City III) at Tell el-Ajjul was destroyed at the end of the MBA, the following phase of occupation (City II) belonging to LB I …. There is some uncertainty as to exactly when bichrome ware first appeared at Tell el-Ajjul.
Fragments have been found in the courtyard area of Palace I, but some writers suggest that this area remained in use into the period of Palace II, and that the bichrome ware should therefore be regarded as intrusive in the Palace I level ….
It seems feasible to suggest that the invading Philistines were responsible for the destruction of City III, though it is also possible that its destruction was the work of Amalekites occupying the Negeb (where we find them settled a short while after the Exodus; cf. Num. 13:29); in view of Velikovsky’s identification of the biblical Amalekites with the Hyksos … the Amalekite occupation of the Negeb could plausibly be dated, like the Hyksos invasion of Egypt, to roughly the time of the Exodus …. But if our arguments have been correct thus far, the evidence of the bichrome ware favours the Philistines as the newcomers to the site, and as the builders of City II.
[End of quotes]
 
Next we come to the Philistines in the era of King Saul, for a proper appreciation of which I return to Dr. Courville’s thesis. He, initially contrasting the Aegean ware with that of the distinctive Philistine type, has written:
 
The new pottery found at Askelon [Ashkelon] at the opening of Iron I, and correlated with the invasion of the Sea Peoples, was identified as of Aegean origin. A similar, but not identical, pottery has been found in the territory north of Palestine belonging to the much earlier era of late Middle Bronze. By popular views, this is prior to the Israelite occupation of Palestine. By the altered chronology, this is the period of the late judges and the era of Saul.
… That the similar pottery of late Middle Bronze, occurring both in the north and in the south, is related to the culture found only in the south at the later date is apparent from the descriptions of the two cultures. Of this earlier culture, which should be dated to the time of Saul, Miss Kenyon commented:
 
The pottery does in fact provide very useful evidence about culture. The first interesting point is the wealth of a particular class of painted pottery …. The decoration is bichrome, nearly always red and black, and the most typical vessels have a combination of metopes enclosing a bird or a fish with geometric decoration such as a “Union Jack” pattern or a Catherine wheel. At Megiddo the first bichrome pottery is attributed to Stratum X, but all the published material comes from tombs intrusive into this level. It is in fact characteristic of Stratum IX. Similar pottery is found in great profusion in southern Palestine … Very similar vessels are also found on the east coast of Cyprus and on the coastal Syrian sites as far north as Ras Shamra. [Emphasis Courville’s]
 
Drawings of typical examples of this pottery show the same stylized bird with back-turned head that characterized the pottery centuries later at Askelon.
… The anachronisms and anomalies in the current views on the interpretation of this invasion and its effects on Palestine are replaced by a consistent picture, and one that is in agreement with the background provided by Scripture for the later era in the very late [sic] 8th century B.C.
[End of quotes]
 
 


[1] It is interesting in light of this that Dr. J. Osgood has synchronized Chalcolithic En-geddi with the era of Abraham. ‘Times of Abraham’, p. 181.
[2] ‘The Arrival of the Philistines’, p. 13.
[3] ‘The Arrival of the Philistines’, pp. 14-15.

Wednesday, October 2, 2019

The Philistines of Crete and Alalakh


 

 
by
 
Damien F. Mackey
 
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The conventional chronology has the Philistines all mixed up.
They do not emerge in history until the time of pharaoh Ramses III, in the early C12th BC, we are told.
But, apart from the fact that Ramses III has been dated several centuries too early, archaeology tells us quite a different story about the Philistines.
So Dr. Courville tells.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
I was heavily reliant upon the research of Dr. Donovan Courville (The Exodus Problem and its Ramifications, 1971, I and II) for my discussion of the Philistines in my university thesis:
 
A Revised History of the Era of King Hezekiah of Judah
and its Background
 
AMAIC_Final_Thesis_2009.pdf
 
in Volume One, Chapter Two: “The Philistines and their Allies”.
Beginning on p. 46, I wrote:
 
The Earlier Philistine History
 
It remains to be determined whether or not the Philistines can be traced all the way back to Crete in accordance with the biblical data; though obviously, from what has been said, to well before the time of the ‘Sea Peoples’, whose immediate origins were Aegean, not Cretan.
 
Courville has looked to trace just such an archaeological trail, back through the era of the late Judges/Saul; to Alalakh (modern Atchana) at the time of Iarim-Lim (Yarim-Lim) of Iamkhad (Yamkhad) and Hammurabi of Babylon; and finally to Crete in early dynastic times. I shall be basically reproducing Courville here, though with one significant chronological divergence, in regard to his dating of the Alalakh sequences. Courville has, according to my own chronological estimation for Hammurabi and Iarim-Lim, based on Hickman … dated the Hammurabic era about four centuries too early (as opposed to the conventional system’s seven centuries too early) on the time scale. Courville had wonderfully described Hammurabi as “floating about in a liquid chronology of Chaldea”, just after his having also correctly stated that: … “Few problems of ancient chronology have been the topic of more extensive debate among scholars than the dates to be ascribed to the Babylonian king Hammurabi and his dynasty …”. And so he set out to establish Hammurabi in a more secure historical setting. This, I do not think he managed successfully to achieve however.
 
Courville’s re-location of Hammurabi to the approximate time of Joshua and the Conquest is still fairly “liquid” chronologically, as it seems to me, without his having been able to establish any plausible syncretisms beyond those already known for Hammurabi (e.g. with Shamsi-Adad I and Zimri-Lim). Revisionist Hickman on the other hand, despite his radical lowering of the Hammurabic era even beyond the standard [Velikovskian] scale, by about seven centuries to the time of kings David and Solomon (c. C10th BC), has been able to propose and develop what are to my way of thinking some promising syncretisms, e.g. between David’s Syrian foe, Hadadezer, and Shamsi-Adad I (c. 1809-1776 BC, conventional dates), with the latter’s father Ilu-kabkabu being the biblical Rekhob, father of Hadadezer (2 Samuel 8:3);127 and between Iarim-Lim and the biblical Joram (var. Hadoram), son of To’i, and prince of Hamath (cf. 2 Samuel 8:10& 1 Chronicles 18:10).
 
I shall have cause to re-visit some of these kings in the following chapter.
 
Comment: I have since written articles such as the following developing this necessary chronological revision of the Hammurabic era:
 
Davidic Influence on King Hammurabi
 
https://www.academia.edu/30639370/Davidic_Influence_on_King_Hammurabi
 
and:
 
Hammurabi and Zimri-Lim as Contemporaries of Solomon
 
https://www.academia.edu/35404463/Hammurabi_and_Zimri-Lim_as_Contemporaries_of_Solomon
 
Continuing with my thesis (now on p. 47):
 
So now, with Hammurabi and his era somewhat more securely located, as I think, than according to Courville’s proposed re-location - and hence with the potential for a more accurate archaeological matrix - we can continue on with Courville’s excellent discussion of the archaeology of the early Philistines: ….
 
VIII. The Culture of the Sea Peoples in the Era of the Late Judges
 
The new pottery found at Askelon [Ashkelon] at the opening of Iron I, and correlated with the invasion of the Sea Peoples, was identified as of Aegean origin. A similar, but not identical, pottery has been found in the territory north of Palestine belonging to the much earlier era of late Middle Bronze. By popular views, this is prior to the Israelite occupation of Palestine. By the altered chronology, this is the period of the late judges and the era of Saul.
 
… That the similar pottery of late Middle Bronze, occurring both in the north and in the south, is related to the culture found only in the south at the later date is apparent from the descriptions of the two cultures. Of this earlier culture, which should be dated to the time of Saul, Miss Kenyon commented:
 
The pottery does in fact provide very useful evidence about culture. The first interesting point is the wealth of a particular class of painted pottery …. The decoration is bichrome, nearly always red and black, and the most typical vessels have a combination of metopes enclosing a bird or a fish with geometric decoration such as a “Union Jack” pattern or a Catherine wheel. At Megiddo the first bichrome pottery is attributed to Stratum X, but all the published material comes from tombs intrusive into this level. It is in fact characteristic of Stratum IX. Similar pottery is found in great profusion in southern Palestine … Very similar vessels are also found on the east coast of Cyprus and on the coastal Syrian sites as far north as Ras Shamra. [Emphasis Courville’s]
 
Drawings of typical examples of this pottery show the same stylized bird with back-turned head that characterized the pottery centuries later at Askelon.
… The anachronisms and anomalies in the current views on the interpretation of this invasion and its effects on Palestine are replaced by a consistent picture, and one that is in agreement with the background provided by Scripture for the later era in the very late [sic] 8th century B.C.
[End of quotes]
 
 
Courville now turns to the archaeology at the site of Alalakh on the shore of the Mediterranean at its most northeast protrusion, in order “to trace this culture one step
farther back in time” (though in actual fact, by my chronology, it will bring him to approximately the same time – though a different place). ….
 
 
 
IX. The Culture of Level VI at Alalakh Is Related to That of the Philistines
 
He commences by recalling Sir Leonard Woolley’s investigations at this site in the 1930’s, during which Woolley discovered “seventeen archaeological levels of occupation”:
 
A solid synchronism is at hand to correlate Level VII at Alalakh with the era of Hammurabi of the First Dynasty at Babylon …. The basis for this synchronism is found in the Mari Letters where it is stated that
 
“… there are ten or fifteen kings who follow Hammurabi of Babylon and ten or fifteen who follow Rim-sin of Larsa but twenty kings follow Yarim-Lim of Yamkhad”.
 
Investigations at Alalakh revealed numerous tablets inscribed in cuneiform, most of which are by the third of the three kings of the dynasty, Yarim-Lim by name. He was the son of the first king of the dynasty, who had the name Hammurabi, and who is believed to have been the brother of Hammurabi in Babylon. Since the First Dynasty at Babylon was of Amorite origin, then so also was the Yarim-Lim dynasty of Amorite origin.
In the reports by Woolley, he indicates the find at Alalakh of two characteristic pottery types which were designated as “White-Slip milk bowls” and “Base-Ring Ware”. As the digging proceeded downward, he found that such types of  pottery were plentiful in Level VI, all but disappeared in Level VII, and then reappeared in all levels from VIII to XVI. Level VII, which did not contain the pottery, was the level containing the inscribed tablets of the Yarim-Lim dynasty. The obvious conclusion was that the people of Yarim-Lim (Amorites) had conquered this city and probably also the surrounding territory, ruling it for a period estimated to have been about 50 years. At the end of this time, the original inhabitants were able to reconquer the site and reoccupy it.
 
Courville now turns his attention to seeking an identity for the people from whom the city of Alalakh was taken for about half a century, but who then reoccupied it: ….
 
What then was this culture like …? We let Woolley tell us about the culture:
 
… We do indeed know extremely little about the Level VI buildings. It is to the pottery that we must look for information about Level VI, and the pottery can tell us a good deal. On the one hand we have what I have called the “nationalist revival” of the traditional painted ware which had been suppressed under the late regime, and some examples of this are perfect replicas of the old both in form and in decoration, but as time goes on, there appear modifications of the long-established types – instead of the isolated and static figures of birds or animals these become active and are combined in running scenes surrounding the whole pot without the interruption of the triglyph-like partitions which were once the rule … For the first time we get a polychrome decoration in red and black paint on a buff surface, and the design includes not only birds but the “Union Jack” motive which is specially characteristic of contemporary Palestine …[Emphasis Courville’s]
 
As one examines this pottery description, he will be struck with the notable similarities of decoration found on the pottery at Megiddo for the era of Philistine occupation in the time of Saul. There is the same use of red and black paint, the similar use of birds as a decoration motif, and the same use of the “Union Jack”.
[End of quotes]
 
Comment: The biblical scribes were not so much interested in the glorious progress of empires and nations as with the people of Israel. Hence it gives us a very limited notion of the extent of the territory of the Philistines, for example. Simply from a reading of the Bible we might draw the conclusion that the Philistines were largely confined to the Shephelah region of Palestine. Previously I have written on this phenomenon of localisation:
 
 
Now, the reason why the Bible does not mention any of these extraordinary matters is because the biblical scribes were just not interested in empires. Hiram is simply designated “King Hiram of Tyre” in the Bible (e.g. 1 Kings 5:1), even though Tyre may not have been the greatest city over which he ruled; just the major one in closest proximity to Israel. The Bible gives no real details of the great extent of Hiram’s power and influence.
....
And, while there is plenty in the Bible to indicate the greatness of king Solomon himself, the sacred scribes seem to have completely lost interest in him at that point in his reign when he apostatised from his worshipping of the one God and became an international entrepreneur. And it is at this very point when king Solomon really starts to get going internationally as a trader and businessman, with a fleet of Phoenician built ships at is disposal and the cruel corvée, now established even in Israel. {I have argued in “House of David” that Solomon, as Senenmut, was also in charge of the corvée in Hatshepsut’s Egypt}. ....
 
 
Now, projecting back well beyond the time of Yarim-Lim, whom I have identified with the biblical King Hiram of Tyre in “King Hiram the Historical” (thesis, p. 49):
 
Finally, Courville traces this distinctive archaeological path all the way back to Crete. I am giving only the barest outlines of his discussion here: ….
 
X. The Sea Peoples of Crete
 
With the evidences thus far noted before us, we are now in a position to examine the archaeological reports from Crete for evidences of the early occupation of this site by the Caphtorim (who are either identical to the Philistines of later Scripture or are closely related to them culturally). We now have at least an approximate idea of the nature of the culture for which we are looking ….
… we can hardly be wrong in recognizing the earliest occupants of Crete as the people who represented the beginnings of the people later known in Scripture as the Philistines, by virtue of the stated origin of the Philistines in Crete. This concept holds regardless of the name that may be applied to this early era by scholars.
The only site at which Cretan archaeology has been examined for its earliest occupants is at the site of the palace at Knossos. At this site deep test pits were dug into the earlier occupation levels. If there is any archaeological evidence available from Crete for its earliest period, it should then be found from the archaeology of these test pits. The pottery found there is described by Dr. Furness, who is cited by Hutchinson.
 
“Dr. Furness divides the early Neolithic I fabrics into (a) coarse unburnished ware and (b) fine burnished ware, only differing from the former in that the pot walls are thinner, the clay better mixed, and the burnish more carefully executed. The surface colour is usually black, but examples also occur of red, buff or yellow, sometimes brilliant red or orange, and sometimes highly variegated sherds”.
 
A relation was observed between the decoration of some of this pottery from early Neolithic I in Crete with that at the site of Alalakh ….
Continuing to cite Dr. Furness, Hutchinson commented:
 
Dr. Furness justly observes that “as the pottery of the late Neolithic phases seems to have developed at Knossos without a break, it is to the earliest that one must look for evidence of origin of foreign connections”, and she therefore stresses the importance of a small group with plastic decoration that seems mainly confined to the Early Neolithic I levels, consisting of rows of pellets immediately under the rim (paralleled on burnished pottery of Chalcolithic [predynastic] date from Gullucek in the Alaca [Alalakh] district of Asia Minor). [Emphasis Courville’s]
 
While the Archaeological Ages of early Crete cannot with certainty be correlated with the corresponding eras on the mainland, it would seem that Chalcolithic on the mainland is later than Early Neolithic in Crete; hence any influence of one culture on the other is more probably an influence of early Cretan culture on that of the mainland. This is in agreement with Scripture to the effect that the Philistines migrated from Crete to what is now the mainland at some point prior to the time of Abraham. ….
[End of quotes]